August 1, 2018
The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
Wendland, C., Yadav M., Stock, A. and Seager, J. 2017. Gender, Women and Sanitation. In: J.B. Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros, (eds) Global Water Pathogen Project. http://www.waterpathogens.org (J.B. Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros) (eds) Part 1 The Health Hazards of Excreta: Theory and Control) http://www.waterpathogens.org/book/gender-and-sanitation Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO.
Acknowledgements: K.R.L. Young, Project Design editor; Website Design: Agroknow (http://www.agroknow.com)
|Last published: August 1, 2018|
Women and girls are especially affected by inadequate sanitation because of gender related differences - cultural and social factors - but also because of sex-related differences - physiological factors. Gender refers to the social differences and relations between men and women which are learned and often constructed and which differ in various societies and can change over time. Women often bear cleaning responsibilities and in many cases also are responsible for the disposal of human waste. During menstruation, pregnancy and postnatal stages the need for adequate sanitation becomes even more critical and Toilet-avoidance dehydration is a particular health threat. Women are acutely aware of safety and privacy issues associated with the need for sanitation. Widespread violence against women in relation to sanitation use has been well documented in dozens of countries, including Fiji, India, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa. Finally, inadequate involvement of both men and women has hindered programmes and projects aimed at addressing sustainability in sanitation. There are tremendous socio-economic benefits associated with improved sanitation services including efficiency (that is reduced time due to health and care-giving burdens), safety, improved health, transparency and good governance and empowerment. Gender mainstreaming can empower women to make strategic choices in terms of rights to assets and services, leading to better education and a healthier and productive population and improved social capital.
The main objectives of this chapter are the following:
In the water and sanitation sector (WSS) but particularly in the sanitation sector, women and girls are especially affected by inadequate sanitation because of gender related differences - cultural and social factors - but also because of sex-related differences - physiological factors. Gender refers to the social differences and relations between men and women which are learned and often constructed and which differ in various societies and can change over time.
Women and men generally have different roles in sanitation. In most societies, women have primary responsibility for management of household water supply, sanitation and health.
Women and girls are especially affected by inadequate sanitation conditions due to physiological/biological factors. This includes issues around menstruation and reproductive health which require a certain sanitation standard.
Inadequate or no access to sanitation affects women and girls in the following ways:
Menstruating women and girls are stigmatized in many cultures, being perceived as dirty, impure and polluting. Due to the low priority of menstrual hygiene from policy-making to decision on household budgets, many girls and women face very practical difficulties in managing their menstruation. They fear smelling or staining and are not able to attend school or work.
E.g. the practice of ‘Chaupadi’ or the confinement of a women during her period to a cow shed (owing to her perceived uncleanliness and bad luck) was outlawed in Nepal’s Supreme Court in 2005, but deep-rooted beliefs still persist (Sharma, 2005).
Quote by Catarina de Albuquerque, former UN Special Rapporteur on the human right to water and sanitation:
“In many countries, social or cultural norms prevent girls and women from using the same sanitation facilities as male relatives, for instance the father-in-law, or prohibit the use of household facilities on the days women and girls menstruate. More generally, menstrual hygiene management presents an enormous challenge for many adolescent girls and women. I have made it a priority during my mandate to always enquire about menstrual hygiene, and I have found that talking about menstruation is taboo all over the world.”
Women are acutely aware of safety and privacy issues associated with the need for sanitation (Hannan and Andersson, 2002). Women are much more facilities-dependent than men: men may be able to urinate discreetly in open spaces outside latrines. Given cultural norms and physiological differences, women, however, are typically much more dependent on using latrine facilities. According to the United Nations, 2.5 billion people do not have access to proper sanitation, including private toilets in their homes. Sharing public toilets with men puts women at great risk of violence and sexual assault. From the tsunami refugee camps of Sri Lanka, to the slums of Kibera, Kenya, to the everyday toilet landscapes of most of the developing world, reports are common and frequent of women being raped, stalked, or assaulted when they use public facilities that are not monitored or secured. Open defecation brings the same dangers, while also breaking cultural and body taboos for women.
Widespread violence against women in relation to sanitation use has been well documented in dozens of countries, including Fiji, India, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Kenya, Ethiopia, and South Africa.
In most societies, women have the prime responsibility for the management of household water supply, sanitation and health. The provision of hygiene and sanitation are often considered women’s tasks. Women are promoters, educators and leaders of home and community-based sanitation practices.
Cultural norms of femininity impose their own demands: for example in some societies, pregnant women should not be seen in public, and pregnant women are prohibited from using public facilities. In other cultural settings, daughters may not use the same latrine as their fathers or fathers-in-law. The imposed social isolation of women in many societies also prevents them from having access to public and communal facilities (Coates, 1999) .
Women are seldom involved in decision making in WSS (ADB, 1998; ADB, 2006). Women’s concerns and needs are rarely addressed in the provision, design, and siting of sanitation facilities, as societal barriers and discriminatory practices and/or laws often restrict women’s involvement in decision-making regarding planning sanitation facilities, sanitation programmes and projects (GWA, 2006). Management of the sanitation sector is typically seen as a technology domain, which is a key reason for male dominance in the sector as technicians, construction staff and engineers are predominantly male.
It is important to fully involve both men and women in demand-driven sanitation programs, acknowledge the high correlation between gender and poverty reduction where communities decide what type of systems they want and are willing to help finance (Environmental Sanitation, 2005).
Women and men are important stakeholders in the water supply and sanitation due to the different roles they play in the management and use of water and sanitation. Women bear the impact of inadequate, deficient or inappropriate water and sanitation facilities and services. However, men dominate the arena of planning and decision-making regarding water and sanitation investments and women’s views are under-represented, implying that women’s practical and strategic needs are not addressed (Wendland et al., 2012). Inadequate involvement of both men and women has hindered programmes and projects aimed at addressing sustainability in sanitation (Government of Uganda, 2009). Community participation and management approaches have failed to address these issues, largely because communities are seen as a homogeneous unit. This not only affects women but also has an impact on the well-being of households/families and communities and on the education and economic development.
A deliberate strategy of gender mainstreaming in the WSS therefore has many socio-economic benefits, including:
The MDGs’ focus on aggregate outcomes tended to mask inequalities. Improvements in access do not always reach a universal access. Due to the focus on drinking water and toilets, hygiene promotion including hand washing and menstrual hygiene management, critical for public health and gender equality, was not reflected in the MDG framework and has been neglected (United Nations, 2014a).
The new proposed targets under the SDG Water Goal address many of the MDG program shortcomings. Specifically, the SDG scope is expanded to include also hygiene, as well as moving water and sanitation concerns beyond the household to cover non-domestic settings, such as schools, health facilities and working places.
For sanitation, the first priority of the SDGs is to eliminate open defecation. The next step is to strive to achieve universal access to basic drinking water, sanitation and hygiene. Having achieved universal access to basic services, the next step would be for countries to progressively increase the number of people whose services are safely managed (United Nations, 2014b). The final essential element would then be to progressively eliminate inequalities in access to services.
Although there is a lot of evidence that women are deprived in the sanitation sector, gender-disaggregated data is currently mostly absent or significantly incomplete. It’s needed to collect disaggregated data by women and men in the different population groups (e.g. rich/poor; urban/rural) and monitoring the difference in the rate of change between women and men in each group and the general population. The United Nations World Water Assessment Programme UNESCO Project for Gender Sensitive Water Monitoring Assessment and Reporting is proposing and promoting this approach in order to have transparent data and then to target intervention (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/water-and-gender/).