Validation of high rate algal ponds as an efficient wastewater treatment option to improve public health in rural communities


Published on:
March 11, 2019

Chapter info

Copyright:


This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/openaccess/terms-use-ccbysa-en).

Disclaimer:

The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.

Citation:

Fallowfield, H.J., Young, P., Cromar, N., Taylor, M. and Buchanan, N. 2019. Validation of high rate algal ponds as an efficient wastewater treatment option to improve public health in rural communities. In: J.B. Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros, (eds) Global Water Pathogen Project. http://www.waterpathogens.org (S. Petterson and G. Medema (eds) Part 5 Case Studies) http://www.waterpathogens.org/book/validation-of-high-rate-algal-ponds-as-an-efficient-wastewater-treatment-option-to-improve-health Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO.
https://doi.org/10.14321/waterpathogens.79


Acknowledgements: K.R.L. Young, Project Design editor; Website Design: Agroknow (http://www.agroknow.com)

Last published: March 11, 2019
Authors: 
Howard Fallowfield (Health and Environment Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University)Paul Young (Health and Environment Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University)Nancy Cromar (Health and Environment Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University)Michael Taylor (Health and Environment Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University)Neil Buchanan (Health and Environment Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University)

Summary

Highlights

  • Demonstrates safety of effluent reuse from a new rural wastewater treatment system
  • An applied example of the use of Australian wastewater reuse guidelines
  • Use of bacterial and viral surrogates to determine disinfection efficiency
  • Approaches to resolving the practical issues of validating a rural treatment plant
  • Published verified design guidelines for high rate algal ponds in rural communities

Management Objective

The objective of this case study is to determine if wastewater from a South Australian rural community treated using a high rate algal pond (HRAP) can safely be used for irrigation of non-food crops.

Location and Setting

The study was conducted at Kingston on Murray, a town on the southern bank of the Murray River within the District Council of Loxton Waikerie in South Australia, approximately 220 km north of the state capital Adelaide (Figure 1). The town is situated within a citrus and wine grape growing area. The community has a population of approximately 250-300 residents and comprises residential properties, a school and a backpackers hostel accommodating seasonal fruit pickers.

Figure 1. (left) Map of South Australia, with Kingston on Murray marked by a pin approximately 220 km North-East of the capital city Adelaide; (right) the HRAP located at Kingston on Murray, with the paddlewheel visible at the far end of the pond (photo by H. Fallowfield).

Description

The HRAP is incorporated into a Community Wastewater Management Scheme (CWMS). Flushed toilets discharge into on-site septic tanks, from which the effluent is reticulated to a reception pit and pumped to the community managed HRAP. The HRAP comprises a HDPE lined single pass raceway, capable of operation at depths between 0.3-0.5 m and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 10d. A paddlewheel gently circulates the wastewater. Treated wastewater is discharged to a HDPE lined storage pond prior to disposal via woodlot irrigation.

Outcome and Recommendations

The HRAP treated effulent was shown to meet the microbial risk health-based targets set out in the Australian National Guidelines for Water Recycling: Managing Health and Environmental Risks (Phase 1) (NRMMC, 2006) for reuse in non-food crop irrigation. HRAP design and operational guidelines for wastewater treatment for use by planners, managers and consultant engineers were published. Achievement of the health based performance targets for irrigation requires:
Treatment: 10d HRT for > 3-log removal of E. coli and 2-log removal of viral particles. Where helminths are conisdered a hazard HRAPs should be operated at an HRT of 10d, with 15d additional storage time. Continuous inlet flows are preferable to prevent shock loading ; ideally not more than 4% of the pond volume should be introduced over a period shorter than 4% of the HRT.
Restrictive measures: Preferably, effluent should be discharged via sub-surface irrigation. When using spray irrigation suitable buffer zones should be established, the irrigation area should be fenced and the public excluded.

Read more? Click here

Link to the scientific paper of this case study

Toggle