May 13, 2019
The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
Contos, A., Francis, A. and Fyfe, J. 2019. Building a safe recycled water scheme. In: J.B. Rose and B. Jiménez-Cisneros, (eds) Global Water Pathogen Project. http://www.waterpathogens.org (S. Petterson and G. Medema (eds) Part 5 Case Studies) http://www.waterpathogens.org/book/building-a-safe-recycled-water-scheme Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO.
|Last published: May 13, 2019|
The objective of this case study was to:
The town of Parkes is located in central NSW, approximately 400 km west of Sydney. The town of 12,000 undertook an upgrade of their sewage treatment system. As part of this project Parkes Shire Council (PSC) has been exploring opportunities to recycle water throughout the town. A recycled water strategy explicitly mapped the links between the SDGs including climate resilient water supplies, improved green spaces, low carbon water and resilient infrastructure.
Figure 1. Commissioning of the upgraded STP (photo provided by Annalisa Contos)
Parkes Shire Council analysed water sources and use options to optimise the supply and demand of water throughout the town to maintain industry, urban green spaces and supply potable water. An integrated water management study investigated options including stormwater, recycled water, bore, dam and river water. The preferred option for recycled water was to use it for irrigation of community open spaces including golf course, horse racetrack and sports fields. Higher exposure uses such as commercial car wash and schools (including eco-gardens) were considered but not selected in the strategy due to their higher treatment requirements and low demands.
Pathogen reduction values for municipal irrigation were selected from the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling (AGWR, 2006 – see case study 3.2). Considering exposure to facility users and the community the required log10 reduction value for campylobacter of 3.7, rotavirus of 5.2 and Cryptosporidium of 4.0 were determined.
Having established the pathogen reduction requirements, a range of technology combinations including membrane, UV and chlorination were evaluated to meet these requirements. By determining the end users prior to the recycled water plant design, pathogen reduction targets could be explicitly established and unit processes selected to specifically meet the required pathogen reductions.
A multi-disciplinary team including designers, operators, managers and a water quality specialists team engaged in a series of facilitated risk workshops covering process risk, water quality risks, constructability, operability and maintainability.
In addition to secondary treatment, chlorination and UV were selected to achieve the required removals. Chlorination was designed to achieve a minimum 4 log10 reduction of virus and bacteria. UV was designed to achieve 4 log10 reduction of Cryptosporidium and 2 log10 virus (Adenovirus Type 40).
Real-time monitoring parameters of chlorine contact time and UV dose were selected to monitor the critical control points necessary to assure recycled water safety.
Understanding the end user requirements for the recycled water allowed pathogen reduction targets to be established at the project outset. The treatment train could then be selected to efficiently and effectively meet these targets.
The multidisciplinary team, including operator involvement in design provides a high confidence that the plant can both treat the water safely and provide the operations staff with real-time information on water safety.
Read more? Scroll down for a more detailed case study description.
This project took place in Parkes in central New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The local government, Parkes Shire Council (PSC), undertook an integrated water cycle management study to optimise investment in water cycle infrastructure to meet community expectations. The study analysed water sources and use options to optimise the supply and demand of water throughout the town to maintain industry, urban green spaces and supply potable water. The sources investigated included stormwater, recycled water, bore (groundwater), dam (reservoir) and river water. The preferred option for recycled water was to use it for irrigation of community open spaces including golf course, horse racetrack and sports fields. Higher exposure uses such as commercial car wash were considered but not selected in the strategy due to their higher treatment requirements and low demands. The recycled water plant was then designed to provide operation information to continually demonstrate it was producing fit for purpose recycled water.
The overall objectives of the project were to strengthen water security and drought resilience for Parkes by:
Additional project goals included:
In order to achieve these goals it was necessary to:
A recycled water strategy was developed which mapped out the project approach, design criteria and project constraints. The strategy not only considered water quality but also issues associated with available supply vs end user demands, environmental requirements, and project legal approvals. Key aspects considered in the recycled water strategy are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Recycled water strategy
|Project drivers, objectives and goals||International (e.g.SDGs), national and local drivers|
|Governance and administration||Approvals, stakeholders, fiscal governance, project risk management|
|Recycled water scheme components||End users (selection, monthly demands, prioritisation), source water, treatment (design considerations, quantity and quality requirements, energy efficiency), distribution and storage|
|Project assessment process||Environmental, social and governance, technical and economic aspects of the project to be evaluated were documented. These criteria were developed through an earlier community engagement process.|
|Scheme options||High level sizing, treatment technologies, storage and treatment options were considered.|
The strategy outlined a series of work packages (WP) and their linkages to be completed as part of the project (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Work packages (WP) identified in the Parkes' Recycled Water Strategy (figure provided by Parkes Shire Council with permission)
The strategy established that recycled water would be used for the irrigation of open spaces including council operated facilities and those operated by community groups (a golf course and race course). Planned and incidental exposures that were considered are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2. Planned and incidental exposures
|End User||Planned uses||Incidental exposure and unintended uses|
|Golf course||Automatic irrigation of greens, fairway and tees
Hand watering for fertilizer and dry patches
|Overnight exposures (e.g. when at club house, dog walkers etc)
Pooling due to leakage
|Jockey Club||Irrigation of grass track||Jogging while sprinklers operating
Children swimming in dam
|Sports fields||Irrigation of playing fields||Overnight exposures (e.g. dog walkers etc)
Pooling due to leakage
Irrigation of drinking water bubblers
|Parks||Irrigation of grass and gardens||Overnight exposures (e.g. dog walkers etc)
Pooling due to leakage
Irrigation of BBQs and drinking water bubblers
The pathogen log10 requirements (bacteria, virus and protozoa) were established using the default values in the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling (AGWR) (2006) for municipal irrigation (Table 3). The AGWR calculates tolerable risk for 10-6 DALYS per person per year, with assumptions on exposure volumes, frequency of exposure and the pathogens present in the source water. (REFER TO OTHER CASE STUDY)
Table 3. Recycled Water Scheme Log10 reduction reduction requirements
|Municipal irrigation (sports fields)||4.0||5.2||3.7|
A multi-disciplinary team was involved in the project from concept through to delivery. The team included both internal and external stakeholders. Project stakeholders were identified at the project conception. External stakeholders included the regulators (health, infrastructure and environmental regulators) and community (organisations using the recycled water, sporting groups) and internal stakeholder (operators, supervisors, managers, senior staff and councillors).
In developing the project documentation, PSC was careful to encourage and facilitate co-operation across the various professional disciplines involved in the preparation of that documentation. Central to this was the principle of taking a ‘whole of team’ approach to project documentation. By taking this approach PSC was able to ensure consistency in commercial and technical risks across all project documentation, and to ensure that contractual provisions were drafted in a manner that facilitated the outcomes being driven by the technical documentation.
Risk workshops were embedded throughout the project design phase. Initial workshops considered the appropriate technologies to manage the water quality risks. As the design progressed hazard and operability workshops (HAZOPs) and construction hazard and implication review (CHAIR) workshops were undertaken. The HAZOP workshops considered how the proposed design might be operated in an unintended manner. The workshops consider whether there was sufficient redundancy in instruments and how the operators would become aware of plant faults. The CHAIR workshop considered the construction and maintenance of the plant. The PSC recognised that equipment needs to be easy to maintain for it to continue functioning as intended. Each of the workshop outcomes was fed back into the design. The workshops also served to familiarise the plant operators with the proposed plant and upskill them in the proposed plant operation. Water quality risk assessment workshops were conducted at the concept and detailed design phase. These workshops focussed on the design and operation of the unit processes and the instrumentation and SCADA control and recirculation loops required to identify and manage water that was not fit for purpose (i.e. off spec).
At all stages through the design, the focus was on preventative risk management – how to ensure the water the recycled water plant produced would always meet the required log10 reduction values and that the operators had sufficient flexibility so that unsafe water could be detected via operational surrogates and diverted. Diversion pathways were provided for off spec water coming from secondary treatment, UV, chlorination and storage.
PSC selected UV disinfection and chlorination to achieve the required pathogen log10 reductions. Council evaluated the use of membranes as a treatment barrier, however they were not selected as UV and chlorination had a lover resource footprint. The design log10 reductions are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Design Log10 reductions for the Parkes Recycled Water System
|Total Design Recycled Water LRVs||4.5||6.0||8.0|
|Municipal Irrigation LRVs (required)||3.7||5.2||4.0|
PSC acknowledged that additional pathogen removal could be achieved through secondary treatment (intermittently decanted extended aeration tanks and clarification), however there was insufficient data to provide PSC with confidence that these processes would achieve sufficient pathogen reduction to allow removal of one of the disinfection barriers. The system description from source to end-use is in Table 5. The process flow diagram is shown in Figure 3.
Table 5. System design
|Source||Raw sewage is received from the Parkes sewerage network. All sewage is pumped to the STP through a pump station. The pump station can deliver two flows; 180 L/s and 230 L/s, depending upon influent flows. The STP can also accept septage. Operators are present during septage delivery and initiate the transfer of septage from the septage receival area to the inlet works.|
|Treatment overview||The sewage treatment plant (STP) provides tertiary treatment with up to 15,000 equivalent persons (EP) capacity.
Raw sewage passes through screening and grit removal, intermittently decanted extended aeration (IDEA), multi-point alum dosing for phosphorous removal and clarification. Effluent to be released to the environment is disinfected with UV. Effluent for reuse is diverted after the clarifier to the recycled water plant. The recycled water plant consists of disc filtration to reduce suspended solids, UV and gas chlorine disinfection.
|The screening process is achieved through 2 band screens (with a bar screen bypass). Screened water then passes through to the grit removal chamber. Sewage exits the grit removal chamber and passes into a vortex discharge channel. From the vortex discharge channel sewage passes through a splitter which separates the flow into two process streams.|
|Secondary||Two process streams operating in parallel undergo secondary treatment through IDEA. Multi stage alum dosing is available to achieve the required phosphorous removal. Sodium hydroxide dosing is dosed upstream of the IDEA for pH control.|
|Recycled Water Plant||
The recycled water plant is designed to minimise its carbon footprint. There are two operating windows, one during peak solar production and the other during off-peak. Water to be recycled is stored in the recycled water feed storage lagoon (4ML floating cover) to provide feed water during these periods. The design flowrate for the recycled water plant is 36 L/s.
The recycled water plant pump station transfers the secondary treated water to three Amiad disc filters (nominal 20 µm filter pore size) operating in parallel to pre-screen the UV feed water.
An in-line pressure UV unit is used for UV disinfection. The unit was selected to provide a minimum dose of 100 mJ/cm2 to achieve a 2 log reduction of Adenovirus Type 40. This unit was pre-validated for UVTs from 45% (dependent upon feed rate).
Chlorine contact is achieved through a chlorine contact pipe. C.t is 20 mg.min/L to achieve a 4 LRV of Coxsackie B5 virus (Keegan 2012).
|Distribution and storage||After primary disinfection, the water is stored in a recycled water storage tank prior to distribution to end users. Recycled water is stored in dams and tanks on the end users sites prior to use.|
|Effluent discharge||Effluent to be released to the environment is disinfected with UV.|
A process flow diagram is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Process flow diagram for Parkes Water Recycling Plant (figure provided by Parkes Shire Council with permission)
An important aspect of the design is the ability to divert water to environmental discharge if it outside the treatment design envelope. The preventative risk approach was to establish ‘gates’ termed critical control points through which the water would not pass into the next stage of the recycled water system unless it was of suitable quality. The critical control points have associated real-time monitoring parameters. These parameters have a critical limit which if exceeded will divert the water to be re-processed or discharged to the environment. The system critical control points, their monitoring parameters and associated actions are summarised in Table 6. This preventative approach demonstrates leading practice in recycled water treatment.
Table 6. Critical Control Points (CCPs)
|Step (CCP)||Monitoring parameter||Critical limit||Action||Basis|
|UV||UV dose||2 @ 45% UVT||Redirect water to recycled water feed lagoon||2 LRV of adenovirus|
|Chlorination||Calculated C.t (based on post chlorination free chlorine and flow)
Post chlorination pH
|>8.0||Redirect water to recycled water feed lagoon||4 LRV Coxsackie B5 virus|
The multi-disciplinary team worked with the regulators to consider start-up scenarios when the free chlorine residual may be low but primary kill was still achieved. The multi-disciplinary team agreed to the following scenarios:
Council also identified that up-skilling its own operators would be essential to the safe operation of the plant. When PSC commenced the planning processes for the design, construction and commissioning of the STP, the need to build capacity within the existing water team and hire for the skills the new STP required was identified. PSC took a 5-pronged approach to this challenge:
This project demonstrated the importance of early identification and documentation of the project’s objectives, drivers and context. By undertaking the recycled water strategy and identifying internal and external stakeholders, a holistic design could be developed – one that provides safe irrigation water as well as meeting community needs and regulatory requirements.
The multi-disciplinary approach to the project is a key for in its success. Engagement of end users and regulators from the project’s development has meant Council understands stakeholders needs and limitations. These were documented in the early stages of the process and incorporated into the design. This early work has reduced the need for later changes, which become more costly as the project progresses. Upskilling of operational staff through the design phases has allowed additional monitoring, operability and maintainability aspects to be incorporated in to the plant design.
Design of water recycling plants should consider
This project demonstrates how a preventative risk management approach can be implemented for the design of a new water recycling scheme. The recycled water strategy documented the project risks and their management as shown in Table 7.
Table 7. Identified project risks
|Project construction risks||Project was considered Strategic Project, oversighted by senior staff through the project management steering committee
A broad-brush risk assessment was used to manage the project risks
|Environmental risks||Management of environmental risks (both construction and on-going operation) was considered as will require consideration as part of the options development.|
Risks associated with transition the scheme from a construction project to an operational asset were considered. This included considerations of:
|Operational risks||Operational risks (including water quality) needed to be considered throughout the planning phases and were evaluated as part of the multicriteria analysis.|
Through the design phase of the project, multi-disciplinary professional facilitated workshops (Table 8) were held using industry standard frameworks to improve the design, operation and maintenance of the recycled water plant.
Table 8. Risk workshops to improve management of water quality
|Workshop||Risk Area||Typical attendees|
|HAZOP (Hazard and operability)||Considered how deviations in plant operation from the design intent may occur||Plant designers, PSC plant operators, PSC managers, independent subject matter expects, workshop facilitator|
|CHAIR (Construction hazard and implication review)||Considered the safe construction, commissioning, maintenance (including instrumentation) and future demolition of the plant||Plant designers, PSC plant operators, PSC managers, independent subject matter expects, workshop facilitator|
|Water quality risk assessment||Identifies and prioritises hazards and risks, identifies the control measures in place for addressing the identified hazards and risks and considered any additional controls or actions that may be required to improve the risk management of the scheme.
Multiple workshops may be necessary to ensure the risk analysis consider the current design and operation of the scheme.
|Plant designers, PSC plant operators, PSC managers, independent subject matter expects, public health and infrastructure regulators workshop facilitator|